See what the £150 Friday Test delivers
Sample Friday Test report.
A written diagnosis, clear priorities and a practical order of action. This fictional example shows how findings lead to next steps.
Illustrative example · fictional venue and evidence
No client information or results are used. A real report is written around your questionnaire and the relevant evidence within your order’s scope.
The example business
North & Field Kitchen
The invented review material comprises an owner questionnaire, two weeks of rotas and prep notes, stock counts and waste records, eight still photographs and three short walkthroughs of prep, storage and handover. No staff or customers appear in the example footage.
These are illustrative inputs, not fixed evidence requirements. Your order confirms what is needed and the upload limits.
Operational scorecard · fictional example
A clear view of the main areas.
The scorecard shows each area beside a plain-English explanation. These numbers are fictional examples of the presentation, not measured results or a benchmark for your venue. The written findings below show how evidence leads to priorities.
| Area | Score | What it means here |
|---|---|---|
| Prep & production | 54 / 100 | The main operational weakness: prep quantities and readiness depend too heavily on judgement and memory. |
| Service flow | 76 / 100 | Service relies on experienced people compensating for informal deployment and handovers. |
| Stock & waste | 61 / 100 | Inconsistent stock units and unstructured waste notes make the records difficult to compare and review. |
| Labour & management | 68 / 100 | Shift responsibilities and follow-up need clearer ownership; the handover relies too heavily on verbal instructions. |
| Food safety | Not assessed | Insufficient evidence. This remote sample does not assess food-safety controls or establish regulatory compliance or approval. |
In a customer report, each assessed area needs a consistent evidence basis and an explanation. Missing evidence is recorded separately; an area that cannot be assessed is marked “Not assessed”. The fictional scores here are not calculated findings, inspection ratings, compliance approval or guarantees of results. Food-safety and local regulatory questions need appropriate local verification.
1 · Written operational diagnosis
What the evidence points to.
Prep lists jobs, but leaves quantities to memory.
In the material: the board lists twelve prep items; three have quantities. The notes record shortages on four services. The owner says each chef chooses how much to prepare.
This suggests inconsistent planning may be contributing to late prep. The sample cannot establish the right quantities: cover forecasts, portions and leftover records are missing.
First step: choose the busiest prep lines, record the expected quantity and ready-by time, and name who checks them before service. Compare that plan with what is used and left over.
The next shift inherits an incomplete picture.
In the material: the rota names the team but leaves delivery and readiness checks unassigned. A walkthrough shows an unfinished prep list; the owner describes handovers being made verbally.
The information suggests a gap in ownership and handover. It does not prove that nobody completes the checks; shift leaders need to confirm what happens in practice.
First step: assign those jobs at the shift brief and record unfinished prep, shortages and the person taking each item forward.
Stock and waste records are hard to compare.
In the material: the count uses packs, ordering uses cases and waste is mostly free-text. The reviewed records contain no consistent link between those units.
This limits what managers can conclude. The evidence does not establish how much stock is lost or what savings are achievable.
First step: use consistent units for a small group of regularly ordered items, record waste with a reason and review the entries weekly.
Needs checking locally: photographs and brief walkthroughs cannot verify food-safety controls or legal compliance. Local requirements, technical limits and any urgent safety concern need the appropriate competent local adviser or authority.
2 · Priorities and practical first steps
Start where the shift loses its footing.
- Prepare for service: give the busiest prep lines quantities, deadlines and a named readiness check.
- Make the handover usable: pass on unfinished work and shortages with an owner.
- Make records comparable: use consistent stock units and review waste reasons.
Start with a small set of tasks the team can maintain. The head chef owns prep planning; the duty manager owns the shift brief and handover; the owner reviews progress.
3 · A 30-day order of action
A manageable sequence.
This is a suggested sequence for the example venue. The owner adapts the timing to staffing and local responsibilities.
Days 1–7 · Establish the routine.
The head chef plans the main prep lines and checks readiness. Duty managers name shift responsibilities and record unfinished work.
Review: can the next shift understand what remains without chasing someone?
Days 8–14 · Record what happens.
Continue the prep and handover routine. The stock lead starts consistent counts and waste reasons for selected items.
Review: are entries complete enough to compare?
Days 15–21 · Adjust the working plan.
The owner and head chef compare planned prep, usage, leftovers and recurring shortfalls. Discuss differences before changing quantities.
Review: which assumptions need better evidence?
Days 22–30 · Decide what needs further work.
Managers review whether the routines are being used and where instructions remain unclear. Set the next actions and owners.
Review: what should be simplified, retained or developed?
4 · A view on optional personalised work
A focused Friday Fix is worth discussing.
A venue-specific prep planner, readiness check and shift handover could give this team a consistent set of working documents. An ordering and stock-review routine could follow once the records are comparable.
The report provides recommendations and this order of action. Building those personalised materials is separate, optional work with its own quote and remote handover. The owner can also use the report with their own team.
This is an operational review, not an inspection, certification or statutory audit. No inspection rating, compliance status, revenue, savings or other result is guaranteed.
See what your operation needs.
When ordering opens, you will describe your business and add your evidence in one order form, then pay to book. Successful payment will confirm the order, with email confirmation and a receipt.
Friday Test ordering is not yet open. You can explore the service and sample report here while we complete the order setup.